Quoting Sergio Paracuellos (2023-03-20 13:17:47) > Hi Stephen, > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 8:38 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Quoting Sergio Paracuellos (2023-03-20 09:18:20) > > > Clock related code has been removed from 'arch/mips/ralink' folder and put > > > into drivers space. Hence remove clock related prototypes which are not > > > used anymore. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > arch/mips/ralink/common.h | 3 --- > > > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/mips/ralink/common.h b/arch/mips/ralink/common.h > > > index 87fc16751281..fcdfc9dc6210 100644 > > > --- a/arch/mips/ralink/common.h > > > +++ b/arch/mips/ralink/common.h > > > @@ -23,9 +23,6 @@ extern struct ralink_soc_info soc_info; > > > > > > extern void ralink_of_remap(void); > > > > > > -extern void ralink_clk_init(void); > > > > Why isn't this removed in the patch that removes the function? > > Because the function exists for all the SoCs code and there are > several patches removing it; one per SoC, so I decided to remove this > at the end. Should I squash all patches together instead? No. But you should squash this with whatever patch removes the last one.
