Re: [PATCH 01/10] dt: bindings: clock: add mtmips SoCs clock device tree binding documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20.03.2023 21:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 20/03/2023 19:07, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
On 20.03.2023 21:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 20/03/2023 17:18, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    items:
+      - enum:
+          - ralink,rt2880-sysc
+          - ralink,rt3050-sysc
+          - ralink,rt3052-sysc
+          - ralink,rt3352-sysc
+          - ralink,rt3883-sysc
+          - ralink,rt5350-sysc
+          - ralink,mt7620-sysc
+          - ralink,mt7620a-sysc
+          - ralink,mt7628-sysc
+          - ralink,mt7688-sysc

One more comment - this and maybe other compatibles - have wrong vendor
prefix. This is mediatek, not ralink.

This platform was acquired from Ralink by MediaTek. I couldn't change
some existing ralink compatible strings to mediatek as Rob explained on
my pinctrl patch series that we don't do that. The compatible strings on
this patch series here are new but I'd rather keep the compatible
strings ralink to keep things consistent.

The comment that you cannot change existing compatibles does not apply
to these, because these are new. However indeed some SoCs have already
compatibles with ralink, so it's fine for these. mt7620 and mt7628 are
already used with mediatek, so these should be rather corrected to new
prefix.

If you're talking about the pinctrl schemas for MT7620 and MT7628, it's just the name of the yaml files that have mediatek. The compatible string is still ralink so it should be kept ralink here as well.

Arınç



[Index of Archives]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux