On 17.03.2023 22:03, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 11:59:20PM +0300, arinc9.unal@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@xxxxxxxxxx>
The MT7628 and MT7688 SoCs contain different pin muxing information,
therefore, should be split. This can be done now that there are compatible
strings to distinguish them from other SoCs.
Split the schema out to mediatek,mt76x8-pinctrl.yaml.
Remove mediatek,mt76x8-pinctrl from mt7620.
Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../pinctrl/mediatek,mt7620-pinctrl.yaml | 379 +--------------
.../pinctrl/mediatek,mt76x8-pinctrl.yaml | 450 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 459 insertions(+), 370 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt76x8-pinctrl.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt7620-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt7620-pinctrl.yaml
index 808dd8bd276f..591bc0664ec6 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt7620-pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt7620-pinctrl.yaml
@@ -11,15 +11,13 @@ maintainers:
- Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx>
description: |
- MediaTek MT7620 pin controller for MT7620, MT7628 and MT7688 SoCs.
+ MediaTek MT7620 pin controller for MT7620 SoC.
Saying MT7620 twice is redundant. Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
It's not always a one to one relation so I'd rather explicitly point the
SoC out like on other schemas like MT7621. Thanks for reviewing!
Arınç
