On 03/03/2023 01:28, arinc9.unal@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@xxxxxxxxxx> > > The MT7628 and MT7688 SoCs contain different pin muxing information, > therefore, should be split. This can be done now that there are compatible > strings to distinguish them from other SoCs. > > Split the schema out to mediatek,mt76x8-pinctrl.yaml. > > Remove mediatek,mt76x8-pinctrl from mt7620. > > Deprecate ralink,mt7620-pinctrl. The reason is, the DTs for mt76x8 which > use this string will incorrectly match the pin muxing information for > mt7620. There's a new string, mediatek,mt7620-pinctrl, which makes the > deprecation possible. > > Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../pinctrl/mediatek,mt7620-pinctrl.yaml | 380 +-------------- > .../pinctrl/mediatek,mt76x8-pinctrl.yaml | 450 ++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 459 insertions(+), 371 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt76x8-pinctrl.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt7620-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt7620-pinctrl.yaml > index 11530b29d52b..38b71c74b9a0 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt7620-pinctrl.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt7620-pinctrl.yaml > @@ -11,16 +11,13 @@ maintainers: > - Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx> > > description: | > - MediaTek MT7620 pin controller for MT7620, MT7628 and MT7688 SoCs. > + MediaTek MT7620 pin controller for MT7620 SoC. > The pin controller can only set the muxing of pin groups. Muxing individual > pins is not supported. There is no pinconf support. > > properties: > compatible: > - enum: > - - mediatek,mt7620-pinctrl > - - mediatek,mt76x8-pinctrl > - - ralink,mt7620-pinctrl I see removal, not deprecation. Best regards, Krzysztof
