On Fri, 03 Mar 2023 03:28:47 +0300, arinc9.unal@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@xxxxxxxxxx> > > The RT3352 and RT5350 SoCs each contain different pin muxing information, > therefore, should be split. This can be done now that there are compatible > strings to distinguish them from other SoCs. > > Split the schema out to ralink,rt3352-pinctrl.yaml and > ralink,rt5350-pinctrl.yaml. > > Remove ralink,rt3352-pinctrl and ralink,rt5350-pinctrl from rt305x. > > Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../pinctrl/ralink,rt305x-pinctrl.yaml | 83 +----- > .../pinctrl/ralink,rt3352-pinctrl.yaml | 243 ++++++++++++++++++ > .../pinctrl/ralink,rt5350-pinctrl.yaml | 206 +++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 455 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/ralink,rt3352-pinctrl.yaml > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/ralink,rt5350-pinctrl.yaml > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
