On 10/02/2023 14:14, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 2:03 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 10/02/2023 13:17, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: >>> MT7621 SoC provides a system controller node for accessing to some registers. >>> Add a phandle in this node to avoid using MIPS related arch operations and >>> includes in watchdog driver code. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml | 7 +++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml >>> index b2b17fdf4..cc701e920 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml >>> @@ -19,6 +19,12 @@ properties: >>> reg: >>> maxItems: 1 >>> >>> + ralink,sysctl: >> >> Thanks for the changes. I did not notice it before - isn't Ralink part >> of Mediatek now? Also compatible is mediatek, not "ralink"? > > Yes, it is. I was using the same prefix as for the memory controller > syscon phandler inside the 'sysc' node [0]. > > I have no problems at all in changing this to 'mediatek' if preferred. > Yes, mediatek as already used in this binding is preferred. Best regards, Krzysztof
