On Mon, Jan 16 2023 at 14:50, Johan Hovold wrote:
> The sanity check for an already mapped virq was done outside of the
s/was/is/
> irq_domain_mutex-protected section which meant that an (unlikely) racing
s/meant/means/
> association may not be detected.
You describe the status quo and then correctly what the fix is:
> Fix this by factoring out the association implementation, which will
> also be used in follow-on changes to rework the locking.
Otherwise your fix fixes something which existed in the past, no?
Thanks,
tglx
