On 28.11.22 09:17, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi David,
On 27/11/2022 11:35, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 16.11.22 11:26, David Hildenbrand wrote:
FOLL_FORCE is really only for ptrace access. According to commit
707947247e95 ("media: videobuf2-vmalloc: get_userptr: buffers are always
writable"), get_vaddr_frames() currently pins all pages writable as a
workaround for issues with read-only buffers.
FOLL_FORCE, however, seems to be a legacy leftover as it predates
commit 707947247e95 ("media: videobuf2-vmalloc: get_userptr: buffers are
always writable"). Let's just remove it.
Once the read-only buffer issue has been resolved, FOLL_WRITE could
again be set depending on the DMA direction.
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c
index 542dde9d2609..062e98148c53 100644
--- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c
+++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ int get_vaddr_frames(unsigned long start, unsigned int nr_frames,
start = untagged_addr(start);
ret = pin_user_pages_fast(start, nr_frames,
- FOLL_FORCE | FOLL_WRITE | FOLL_LONGTERM,
+ FOLL_WRITE | FOLL_LONGTERM,
(struct page **)(vec->ptrs));
if (ret > 0) {
vec->got_ref = true;
Hi Andrew,
see the discussion at [1] regarding a conflict and how to proceed with
upstreaming. The conflict would be easy to resolve, however, also
the patch description doesn't make sense anymore with [1].
Might it be easier and less confusing if you post a v2 of this series
with my patch first? That way it is clear that 1) my patch has to come
first, and 2) that it is part of a single series and should be merged
by the mm subsystem.
Less chances of things going wrong that way.
Just mention in the v2 cover letter that the first patch was added to
make it easy to backport that fix without being hampered by merge
conflicts if it was added after your frame_vector.c patch.
Yes, that's the way I would naturally do, it, however, Andrew prefers
delta updates for minor changes.
@Andrew, whatever you prefer!
Thanks!
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
