пт, 28 окт. 2022 г. в 00:57, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Quoting Siarhei Volkau (2022-10-27 12:20:23)
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4755-cgu.c b/drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4755-cgu.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000..d2eb3ae0c
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4755-cgu.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,346 @@
> [...]
> > +static void __init jz4755_cgu_init(struct device_node *np)
> > +{
> > + int retval;
> > +
> > + cgu = ingenic_cgu_new(jz4755_cgu_clocks,
> > + ARRAY_SIZE(jz4755_cgu_clocks), np);
> > + if (!cgu) {
> > + pr_err("%s: failed to initialise CGU\n", __func__);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + retval = ingenic_cgu_register_clocks(cgu);
> > + if (retval)
> > + pr_err("%s: failed to register CGU Clocks\n", __func__);
> > +
> > + ingenic_cgu_register_syscore_ops(cgu);
> > +}
> > +CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER(jz4755_cgu, "ingenic,jz4755-cgu", jz4755_cgu_init);
>
> Is there another driver that probes this device? CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER()
> is for the situation where we want to probe this device again with
> another platform driver. Please add a comment indicating what that other
> driver is.
I wasn't aware of that, it's just
> + * Heavily based on JZ4725b CGU driver
with no comment either, same as a few others.
Maybe it's better to fix that in a separate commit as per Paul's
proposal on unused macros'?
