The PM notifiers should no longer be ran with RCU disabled (per the previous patches), as such this hack is no longer required either. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 11 +---------- drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c | 8 +------- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c @@ -762,17 +762,8 @@ static void cpu_pm_pmu_setup(struct arm_ case CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED: /* * Restore and enable the counter. - * armpmu_start() indirectly calls - * - * perf_event_update_userpage() - * - * that requires RCU read locking to be functional, - * wrap the call within RCU_NONIDLE to make the - * RCU subsystem aware this cpu is not idle from - * an RCU perspective for the armpmu_start() call - * duration. */ - RCU_NONIDLE(armpmu_start(event, PERF_EF_RELOAD)); + armpmu_start(event, PERF_EF_RELOAD); break; default: break; --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c @@ -747,14 +747,8 @@ static int riscv_pm_pmu_notify(struct no case CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED: /* * Restore and enable the counter. - * - * Requires RCU read locking to be functional, - * wrap the call within RCU_NONIDLE to make the - * RCU subsystem aware this cpu is not idle from - * an RCU perspective for the riscv_pmu_start() call - * duration. */ - RCU_NONIDLE(riscv_pmu_start(event, PERF_EF_RELOAD)); + riscv_pmu_start(event, PERF_EF_RELOAD); break; default: break;
