Hi Jarkko, On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:25:38 +0300 Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 10:35:42AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > > . > > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 8:02 AM Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Tracing with kprobes while running a monolithic kernel is currently > > > impossible because CONFIG_KPROBES is dependent of CONFIG_MODULES. This > > > dependency is a result of kprobes code using the module allocator for the > > > trampoline code. > > > > > > Detaching kprobes from modules helps to squeeze down the user space, > > > e.g. when developing new core kernel features, while still having all > > > the nice tracing capabilities. > > > > > > For kernel/ and arch/*, move module_alloc() and module_memfree() to > > > module_alloc.c, and compile as part of vmlinux when either CONFIG_MODULES > > > or CONFIG_KPROBES is enabled. In addition, flag kernel module specific > > > code with CONFIG_MODULES. > > > > > > As the result, kprobes can be used with a monolithic kernel. > > It's strange when MODULES is n, but vmlinux still obtains module_alloc. > > > > Maybe we need a kprobe_alloc, right? > > Perhaps not the best name but at least it documents the fact that > they use the same allocator. > > Few years ago I carved up something "half-way there" for kprobes, > and I used the name text_alloc() [*]. > > [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200724050553.1724168-1-jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Yeah, I remember that. Thank you for updating your patch! I think the idea (split module_alloc() from CONFIG_MODULE) is good to me. If module support maintainers think this name is not good, you may be able to rename it as text_alloc() and make the module_alloc() as a wrapper of it. Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> for kprobe side. Thank you, -- Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
