Re: [PATCH 21/30] panic: Introduce the panic pre-reboot notifier list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17/05/2022 14:02, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> Tony / Dinh - can I just *skip* this notifier *if kdump* is set or else
>> we run the code as-is? Does that make sense to you?
> 
> The "skip" option sounds like it needs some special flag associated with
> an entry on the notifier chain. But there are other notifier chains ... so that
> sounds messy to me.
> 
> Just all the notifiers in priority order. If any want to take different actions
> based on kdump status, change the code. That seems more flexible than
> an "all or nothing" approach by skipping.
> 
> -Tony

I guess I've expressed myself in a poor way - sorry!

What I'm planning to do in the altera_edac notifier is:

if (kdump_is_set)
 return;

/* regular code */

In other words: if the kdump is set, this notifier will be effectively a
nop (although it's gonna be called).

Lemme know your thoughts Tony, if that makes sense.
Thanks,


Guilherme



[Index of Archives]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux