Extend KVM's eager page splitting to also split huge pages that are
mapped by the shadow MMU. Specifically, walk through the rmap splitting
all 1GiB pages to 2MiB pages, and splitting all 2MiB pages to 4KiB
pages.
Splitting huge pages mapped by the shadow MMU requries dealing with some
extra complexity beyond that of the TDP MMU:
(1) The shadow MMU has a limit on the number of shadow pages that are
allowed to be allocated. So, as a policy, Eager Page Splitting
refuses to split if there are KVM_MIN_FREE_MMU_PAGES or fewer
pages available.
(2) Huge pages may be mapped by indirect shadow pages which have the
possibility of being unsync. As a policy we opt not to split such
pages as their translation may no longer be valid.
(3) Splitting a huge page may end up re-using an existing lower level
shadow page tables. This is unlike the TDP MMU which always allocates
new shadow page tables when splitting. This commit does *not*
handle such aliasing and opts not to split such huge pages.
(4) When installing the lower level SPTEs, they must be added to the
rmap which may require allocating additional pte_list_desc structs.
This commit does *not* handle such cases and instead opts to leave
such lower-level SPTEs non-present. In this situation TLBs must be
flushed before dropping the MMU lock as a portion of the huge page
region is being unmapped.
Suggested-by: Peter Feiner <pfeiner@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ This commit is based off of the original implementation of Eager Page
Splitting from Peter in Google's kernel from 2016. ]
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 3 -
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 307 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 307 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index 05161afd7642..495f6ac53801 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -2360,9 +2360,6 @@
the KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY ioctl, and only for the pages being
cleared.
- Eager page splitting currently only supports splitting
- huge pages mapped by the TDP MMU.
-
Default is Y (on).
kvm.enable_vmware_backdoor=[KVM] Support VMware backdoor PV interface.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 926ddfaa9e1a..dd56b5b9624f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -727,6 +727,11 @@ static void mmu_free_memory_caches(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static struct pte_list_desc *mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache)
{
+ static const gfp_t gfp_nocache = GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_ACCOUNT | __GFP_ZERO;
+
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cache))
+ return kmem_cache_alloc(pte_list_desc_cache, gfp_nocache);
+
return kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(cache);
}
@@ -743,6 +748,28 @@ static gfn_t kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, int index)
return sp->gfn + (index << ((sp->role.level - 1) * PT64_LEVEL_BITS));
}
+static gfn_t sptep_to_gfn(u64 *sptep)
+{
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = sptep_to_sp(sptep);
+
+ return kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(sp, sptep - sp->spt);
+}
+
+static unsigned int kvm_mmu_page_get_access(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, int index)
+{
+ if (!sp->role.direct)
+ return sp->shadowed_translation[index].access;
+
+ return sp->role.access;
+}
+
+static unsigned int sptep_to_access(u64 *sptep)
+{
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = sptep_to_sp(sptep);
+
+ return kvm_mmu_page_get_access(sp, sptep - sp->spt);
+}
+
static void kvm_mmu_page_set_gfn_access(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, int index,
gfn_t gfn, u32 access)
{
@@ -912,6 +939,9 @@ static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache, u64 *spte,
return count;
}
+static struct kvm_rmap_head *gfn_to_rmap(gfn_t gfn, int level,
+ const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot);
+
static void
pte_list_desc_remove_entry(struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
struct pte_list_desc *desc, int i,
@@ -2125,6 +2155,23 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *__kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm *kvm,
return sp;
}
+static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_direct_sp(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
+ union kvm_mmu_page_role role)
+{
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
+ LIST_HEAD(invalid_list);
+
+ BUG_ON(!role.direct);
+
+ sp = __kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(kvm, gfn, role, &invalid_list);
+
+ /* Direct SPs are never unsync. */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(sp && sp->unsync);
+
+ kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page(kvm, &invalid_list);
+ return sp;
+}
+
/*
* Looks up an existing SP for the given gfn and role if one exists. The
* return SP is guaranteed to be synced.
@@ -6063,12 +6110,266 @@ void kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(struct kvm *kvm,
kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, memslot);
}
+static int prepare_to_split_huge_page(struct kvm *kvm,
+ const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+ u64 *huge_sptep,
+ struct kvm_mmu_page **spp,
+ bool *flush,
+ bool *dropped_lock)
+{
+ int r = 0;
+
+ *dropped_lock = false;
+
+ if (kvm_mmu_available_pages(kvm) <= KVM_MIN_FREE_MMU_PAGES)
+ return -ENOSPC;
+
+ if (need_resched() || rwlock_needbreak(&kvm->mmu_lock))
+ goto drop_lock;
+
+ *spp = kvm_mmu_alloc_direct_sp_for_split(true);
+ if (r)
+ goto drop_lock;
+
+ return 0;
+
+drop_lock:
+ if (*flush)
+ kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, slot);
+
+ *flush = false;
+ *dropped_lock = true;
+
+ write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ cond_resched();
+ *spp = kvm_mmu_alloc_direct_sp_for_split(false);
+ if (!*spp)
+ r = -ENOMEM;
+ write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+ return r;
+}
+
+static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_sp_for_split(struct kvm *kvm,
+ const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+ u64 *huge_sptep,
+ struct kvm_mmu_page **spp)
+{
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *split_sp;
+ union kvm_mmu_page_role role;
+ unsigned int access;
+ gfn_t gfn;
+
+ gfn = sptep_to_gfn(huge_sptep);
+ access = sptep_to_access(huge_sptep);
+
+ /*
+ * Huge page splitting always uses direct shadow pages since we are
+ * directly mapping the huge page GFN region with smaller pages.
+ */
+ role = kvm_mmu_child_role(huge_sptep, true, access);
+ split_sp = kvm_mmu_find_direct_sp(kvm, gfn, role);
+
+ /*
+ * Opt not to split if the lower-level SP already exists. This requires
+ * more complex handling as the SP may be already partially filled in
+ * and may need extra pte_list_desc structs to update parent_ptes.
+ */
+ if (split_sp)
+ return NULL;
+
+ swap(split_sp, *spp);
+ init_shadow_page(kvm, split_sp, slot, gfn, role);
+ trace_kvm_mmu_get_page(split_sp, true);
+
+ return split_sp;
+}
+
+static int kvm_mmu_split_huge_page(struct kvm *kvm,
+ const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+ u64 *huge_sptep, struct kvm_mmu_page **spp,
+ bool *flush)
+
+{
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *split_sp;
+ u64 huge_spte, split_spte;
+ int split_level, index;
+ unsigned int access;
+ u64 *split_sptep;
+ gfn_t split_gfn;
+
+ split_sp = kvm_mmu_get_sp_for_split(kvm, slot, huge_sptep, spp);
+ if (!split_sp)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ /*
+ * Since we did not allocate pte_list_desc_structs for the split, we
+ * cannot add a new parent SPTE to parent_ptes. This should never happen
+ * in practice though since this is a fresh SP.
+ *
+ * Note, this makes it safe to pass NULL to __link_shadow_page() below.
+ */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(split_sp->parent_ptes.val))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ huge_spte = READ_ONCE(*huge_sptep);
+
+ split_level = split_sp->role.level;
+ access = split_sp->role.access;
+
+ for (index = 0; index < PT64_ENT_PER_PAGE; index++) {
+ split_sptep = &split_sp->spt[index];
+ split_gfn = kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(split_sp, index);
+
+ BUG_ON(is_shadow_present_pte(*split_sptep));
+
+ /*
+ * Since we did not allocate pte_list_desc structs for the
+ * split, we can't add a new SPTE that maps this GFN.
+ * Skipping this SPTE means we're only partially mapping the
+ * huge page, which means we'll need to flush TLBs before
+ * dropping the MMU lock.
+ *
+ * Note, this make it safe to pass NULL to __rmap_add() below.
+ */
+ if (gfn_to_rmap(split_gfn, split_level, slot)->val) {
+ *flush = true;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ split_spte = make_huge_page_split_spte(
+ huge_spte, split_level + 1, index, access);
+
+ mmu_spte_set(split_sptep, split_spte);
+ __rmap_add(kvm, NULL, slot, split_sptep, split_gfn, access);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Replace the huge spte with a pointer to the populated lower level
+ * page table. Since we are making this change without a TLB flush vCPUs
+ * will see a mix of the split mappings and the original huge mapping,
+ * depending on what's currently in their TLB. This is fine from a
+ * correctness standpoint since the translation will either be identical
+ * or non-present. To account for non-present mappings, the TLB will be
+ * flushed prior to dropping the MMU lock.
+ */
+ __drop_large_spte(kvm, huge_sptep, false);
+ __link_shadow_page(NULL, huge_sptep, split_sp);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static bool should_split_huge_page(u64 *huge_sptep)
+{
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *huge_sp = sptep_to_sp(huge_sptep);
+
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_large_pte(*huge_sptep)))
+ return false;
+
+ if (huge_sp->role.invalid)
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * As a policy, do not split huge pages if SP on which they reside
+ * is unsync. Unsync means the guest is modifying the page table being
+ * shadowed by huge_sp, so splitting may be a waste of cycles and
+ * memory.
+ */
+ if (huge_sp->unsync)
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+static bool rmap_try_split_huge_pages(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
+ const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
+{
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = NULL;
+ struct rmap_iterator iter;
+ u64 *huge_sptep, spte;
+ bool flush = false;
+ bool dropped_lock;
+ int level;
+ gfn_t gfn;
+ int r;
+
+restart:
+ for_each_rmap_spte(rmap_head, &iter, huge_sptep) {
+ if (!should_split_huge_page(huge_sptep))
+ continue;
+
+ spte = *huge_sptep;
+ level = sptep_to_sp(huge_sptep)->role.level;
+ gfn = sptep_to_gfn(huge_sptep);
+
+ r = prepare_to_split_huge_page(kvm, slot, huge_sptep, &sp, &flush, &dropped_lock);
+ if (r) {
+ trace_kvm_mmu_split_huge_page(gfn, spte, level, r);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (dropped_lock)
+ goto restart;
+
+ r = kvm_mmu_split_huge_page(kvm, slot, huge_sptep, &sp, &flush);
+
+ trace_kvm_mmu_split_huge_page(gfn, spte, level, r);
+
+ /*
+ * If splitting is successful we must restart the iterator
+ * because huge_sptep has just been removed from it.
+ */
+ if (!r)
+ goto restart;
+ }
+
+ if (sp)
+ kvm_mmu_free_shadow_page(sp);
+
+ return flush;
+}
+
+static void kvm_rmap_try_split_huge_pages(struct kvm *kvm,
+ const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+ gfn_t start, gfn_t end,
+ int target_level)
+{
+ bool flush;
+ int level;
+
+ /*
+ * Split huge pages starting with KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL and working
+ * down to the target level. This ensures pages are recursively split
+ * all the way to the target level. There's no need to split pages
+ * already at the target level.
+ *
+ * Note that TLB flushes must be done before dropping the MMU lock since
+ * rmap_try_split_huge_pages() may partially split any given huge page,
+ * i.e. it may effectively unmap (make non-present) a portion of the
+ * huge page.
+ */
+ for (level = KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; level > target_level; level--) {
+ flush = slot_handle_level_range(kvm, slot,
+ rmap_try_split_huge_pages,
+ level, level, start, end - 1,
+ true, flush);
+ }
+
+ if (flush)
+ kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, slot);
+}
+
/* Must be called with the mmu_lock held in write-mode. */
void kvm_mmu_try_split_huge_pages(struct kvm *kvm,
const struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
u64 start, u64 end,
int target_level)
{
+ if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm))
+ kvm_rmap_try_split_huge_pages(kvm, memslot, start, end,
+ target_level);
+
if (is_tdp_mmu_enabled(kvm))
kvm_tdp_mmu_try_split_huge_pages(kvm, memslot, start, end,
target_level, false);
@@ -6086,6 +6387,12 @@ void kvm_mmu_slot_try_split_huge_pages(struct kvm *kvm,
u64 start = memslot->base_gfn;
u64 end = start + memslot->npages;
+ if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm)) {
+ write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ kvm_rmap_try_split_huge_pages(kvm, memslot, start, end, target_level);
+ write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ }
+
if (is_tdp_mmu_enabled(kvm)) {
read_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
kvm_tdp_mmu_try_split_huge_pages(kvm, memslot, start, end, target_level, true);
--
2.35.1.723.g4982287a31-goog
