On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 01:58:01PM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/r4k-bugs64.c b/arch/mips/kernel/r4k-bugs64.c
> > index 35729c9e6cfa..11392e40d034 100644
> > --- a/arch/mips/kernel/r4k-bugs64.c
> > +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/r4k-bugs64.c
> > @@ -163,7 +163,8 @@ static __always_inline __init void check_mult_sh(void)
> > }
> >
> > pr_cont("no.\n");
> > - panic(bug64hit, !R4000_WAR ? r4kwar : nowar);
> > + panic(bug64hit, !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_R4000_WORKAROUNDS) ? r4kwar :
> > + nowar);
>
> I think it'll read better if formatted like this:
>
> panic(bug64hit,
> !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_R4000_WORKAROUNDS) ? r4kwar : nowar);
>
> or without the negation even:
>
> panic(bug64hit,
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_R4000_WORKAROUNDS) ? nowar : r4kwar);
>
> Likewise throughout.
that looks much nicer, I'll send a v2 with that changed
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
