On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 09:34:47PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote: > On 2022/2/10 00:16, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > And, to reinstate, we already have a mechanism to set an EDID, and if it > > wasn't an option, the DT is not the place to store an EDID blob. > > Hi, > > > if DT is not the place to store EDID blob, why nvidia can do that ? > > output->edid = of_get_property(output->of_node, "nvidia,edid", &size); > [1][2] Because that binding is 10 years old and never got reviewed by a DT maintainer. Things change, some things we did in the past have been mistakes that we don't want to repeat, can we move forward? Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
