On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 04:57:15PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > The double `Address' in the comment in line 487 is repeated. Remove one > of them from the comment. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <wangborong@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/mips/include/asm/sibyte/sb1250_mc.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/sibyte/sb1250_mc.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/sibyte/sb1250_mc.h > index c02fe823effc..61411619dff3 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/sibyte/sb1250_mc.h > +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/sibyte/sb1250_mc.h > @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ > > > /* > - * Bank Address Address Bits Register (Table 6-22) > + * Bank Address Bits Register (Table 6-22) > */ > > #define S_MC_BA_RESERVED 0 > -- > 2.34.1 applied to mips-next. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
