Re: [PATCH v2] MIPS: Loongson64: Use three arguments for slti

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 09:56:17AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> LLVM's integrated assembler does not support 'slti <reg>, <imm>':
> 
> <instantiation>:16:12: error: invalid operand for instruction
>  slti $12, (0x6300 | 0x0008)
>            ^
> arch/mips/kernel/head.S:86:2: note: while in macro instantiation
>  kernel_entry_setup # cpu specific setup
>  ^
> <instantiation>:16:12: error: invalid operand for instruction
>  slti $12, (0x6300 | 0x0008)
>            ^
> arch/mips/kernel/head.S:150:2: note: while in macro instantiation
>  smp_slave_setup
>  ^
> 
> To increase compatibility with LLVM's integrated assembler, use the full
> form of 'slti <reg>, <reg>, <imm>', which matches the rest of
> arch/mips/. This does not result in any change for GNU as.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1526
> Reported-by: Ryutaroh Matsumoto <ryutaroh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> v1 -> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207170129.578089-1-nathan@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> * Fix typos in commit message ("stli" -> "slti") [Sergey]
> 
>  arch/mips/include/asm/mach-loongson64/kernel-entry-init.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

applied to mips-next.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]



[Index of Archives]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux