Re: [PATCH] irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2: add put_device() after of_find_device_by_node()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 11/8/2021 7:29 PM, cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Ye Guojin <ye.guojin@xxxxxxxxxx>

This was found by coccicheck:
./drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c,328,1-7,ERROR  missing put_device;
call of_find_device_by_node on line 234, but without a corresponding
object release within this function.
./drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c,341,1-7,ERROR  missing put_device;
call of_find_device_by_node on line 234, but without a corresponding
object release within this function.

Addtionally, fixup the potential problem that memory is not released
before return.

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ye Guojin <ye.guojin@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c | 3 ++-
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c
index d80e67a6aad2..aaa70619f3c0 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ static int __init bcm7120_l2_intc_probe(struct device_node *dn,
  	pr_info("registered %s intc (%pOF, parent IRQ(s): %d)\n",
  		intc_name, dn, data->num_parent_irqs);
- return 0;
+	ret = 0;

That cannot be right, we would take the irq_free_domain label and unregister the interrupt domain. The put_device() ought to be done when we stop making use of the platform_device, that is at line 246 after we call platform_irq_count().

Thanks!
--
Florian



[Index of Archives]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux