On 11/5/21 9:44 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 11/5/21 8:31 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 11/5/2021 7:58 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
Several header files need info on CONFIG_32BIT or CONFIG_64BIT,
but kconfig symbol BCM63XX does not provide that info. This leads
to many build errors, e.g.:
arch/mips/include/asm/page.h:196:13: error: use of undeclared identifier 'CAC_BASE'
return x - PAGE_OFFSET + PHYS_OFFSET;
arch/mips/include/asm/mach-generic/spaces.h:91:23: note: expanded from macro 'PAGE_OFFSET'
#define PAGE_OFFSET (CAC_BASE + PHYS_OFFSET)
arch/mips/include/asm/io.h:134:28: error: use of undeclared identifier 'CAC_BASE'
return (void *)(address + PAGE_OFFSET - PHYS_OFFSET);
arch/mips/include/asm/mach-generic/spaces.h:91:23: note: expanded from macro 'PAGE_OFFSET'
#define PAGE_OFFSET (CAC_BASE + PHYS_OFFSET)
arch/mips/include/asm/uaccess.h:82:10: error: use of undeclared identifier '__UA_LIMIT'
return (__UA_LIMIT & (addr | (addr + size) | __ua_size(size))) == 0;
Fixes: e7300d04bd08 ("MIPS: BCM63xx: Add support for the Broadcom BCM63xx family of SOCs.")
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Paul Burton <paulburton@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Maxime Bizon <mbizon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Note: I did see a bunch of build errors like this one:
../arch/mips/kernel/r4k_fpu.S:217: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips1 (mips1) `ldc1 $f24,192($4)'
but I'm hoping/guessing that this is due to not having a proper compiler
for the BCM63xx target.
arch/mips/Kconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- linux-next-20211105.orig/arch/mips/Kconfig
+++ linux-next-20211105/arch/mips/Kconfig
@@ -329,6 +329,7 @@ config BCM63XX
select SYNC_R4K
select DMA_NONCOHERENT
select IRQ_MIPS_CPU
+ select CPU_SUPPORTS_32BIT_KERNEL
That's one option, the other could be to add:
select SYS_HAS_CPU_BMIPS32_3300
select SYS_HAS_CPU_BMIPS4350
select SYS_HAS_CPU_BMIPS4380
Which would ensure that CPU_SUPPORTS_32BIT_KERNEL is selected AFAICT. Can you try that? What config file did you use to produce that build error BTW?
The .config file that is attached to this report from the kernel test robot:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202111051920.dcCUQ0QN-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
Yes, I'll give your suggestion a try on Saturday.
OK, that works also. I'll send a v2 with that.
However, with that kernel .config file, it does expose another
unrelated longstanding build error:
/opt/crosstool/gcc-11.1.0-nolibc/mips-linux/bin/mips-linux-ld: drivers/iio/adc/ingenic-adc.o: in function `jz4725b_adc_init_clk_div':
ingenic-adc.c:(.text.jz4725b_adc_init_clk_div+0x10): undefined reference to `clk_get_parent'
/opt/crosstool/gcc-11.1.0-nolibc/mips-linux/bin/mips-linux-ld: drivers/iio/adc/ingenic-adc.o: in function `jz4770_adc_init_clk_div':
ingenic-adc.c:(.text.jz4770_adc_init_clk_div+0x10): undefined reference to `clk_get_parent'
I prepared a patch for that on April 26, 2021, but it looks like I never sent it.
Oh, it's incomplete, not really working yet.
Any comments on how to really fix this problem?
---
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIPS does not always provide clk*() interfaces and there are no
always-present stubs for them, so depending on "MIPS || COMPILE_TEST"
is not string enough to prevent build errors.
Likewise MACH_INGENIC_SOC || COMPILE_TEST is not strong enough
since if only COMPILE_TEST=y, there are still the same build errors.
Can we fix the dissonance between HAVE_CLK and COMMON_CLK?
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-next-20210426.orig/drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig
+++ linux-next-20210426/drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ config INA2XX_ADC
config INGENIC_ADC
tristate "Ingenic JZ47xx SoCs ADC driver"
- depends on MIPS || COMPILE_TEST
+ depends on MACH_INGENIC_SOC || COMPILE_TEST
select IIO_BUFFER
help
Say yes here to build support for the Ingenic JZ47xx SoCs ADC unit.
thanks.
--
~Randy
