On 10/29/21 5:37 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 2021-10-28 19:23, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> In order to phase out bcm63xx_wdt and use bcm7038_wdt instead, introduce
>> a platform_device_id table that allows both names to be matched.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
>> b/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
>> index 506cd7ef9c77..2535f450e8a1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
>> @@ -223,6 +223,13 @@ static const struct of_device_id
>> bcm7038_wdt_match[] = {
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, bcm7038_wdt_match);
>>
>> +static const struct platform_device_id bcm7038_wdt_devtype[] = {
>> + { .name = "bcm7038-wdt" },
>> + { .name = "bcm63xx-wdt" },
>> + { /* sentinel */ },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, bcm7038_wdt_devtype);
>
> Do we really want "bcm7038-wdt" here? I don't think it will ever be used
> as apparently BCM7038 uses DT.
Let me dig through the platform_device_id code, but I believe we somehow do.
--
Florian
