On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 23:23:52 +0100,
Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 4:43 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip.h b/include/linux/irqchip.h
> > index ccf32758ea85..146a9d80a6a2 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/irqchip.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/irqchip.h
> > @@ -33,7 +33,15 @@ extern int platform_irqchip_probe(struct platform_device *pdev);
> > #define IRQCHIP_PLATFORM_DRIVER_BEGIN(drv_name) \
> > static const struct of_device_id drv_name##_irqchip_match_table[] = {
> >
> > -#define IRQCHIP_MATCH(compat, fn) { .compatible = compat, .data = fn },
> > +/* Undefined on purpose */
> > +int typecheck_irq_init_cb(struct device_node *, struct device_node *,
> > + struct platform_device *);
> > +
> > +#define typecheck_irq_init_cb(fn) \
> > + __typecheck(typecheck_irq_init_cb, fn) ? fn : fn
>
> That's nice! Shouldn't it also be used for IRQCHIP_DECLARE?
Absolutely. And enabling this shows that changing of_irq_init_cb_t
breaks *all users* of IRQCHIP_DECLARE(). Not an acceptable outcome
when we're at -rc5.
Why can't the relevant drivers use of_find_device_by_node() instead?
That would allow us to keep the status-quo on of_irq_init_cb_t.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
