On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 01:29:30PM +0100, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Almost two months later,
Since you're committer it's expected that you go actively out to look for
review or trade with someone else who has some patches that need a quick
look. It will not happen automatically, this is on you.
Also generally after 2 weeks the patch is lost and you need to ping it.
-Daniel
>
>
> Le mar., mars 23 2021 at 14:40:08 +0000, Paul Cercueil
> <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> > When using a 24-bit panel on a 8-bit serial bus, the pixel clock
> > requested by the panel has to be multiplied by 3, since the subpixels
> > are shifted sequentially.
> >
> > The code (in ingenic_drm_encoder_atomic_check) already computed
> > crtc_state->adjusted_mode->crtc_clock accordingly, but clk_set_rate()
> > used crtc_state->adjusted_mode->clock instead.
> >
> > Fixes: 28ab7d35b6e0 ("drm/ingenic: Properly compute timings when using a
> > 3x8-bit panel")
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v5.10
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Can I get an ACK for my patch?
>
> Thanks!
> -Paul
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c
> > index d60e1eefc9d1..cba68bf52ec5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c
> > @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static void ingenic_drm_crtc_atomic_flush(struct
> > drm_crtc *crtc,
> > if (priv->update_clk_rate) {
> > mutex_lock(&priv->clk_mutex);
> > clk_set_rate(priv->pix_clk,
> > - crtc_state->adjusted_mode.clock * 1000);
> > + crtc_state->adjusted_mode.crtc_clock * 1000);
> > priv->update_clk_rate = false;
> > mutex_unlock(&priv->clk_mutex);
> > }
> > --
> > 2.30.2
> >
>
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
