On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 12:42:56PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 12:35:32PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:06:32PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 12:35:12PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > > I'd really appreciate if somebody with access to an Octeon system could
> > > > test this patch.
> > >
> > > Tested on an Ubiquiti edgerouter 12. Works with problem and I haven't
> > > even seen a change in memory output.
> >
> > Is "works with problem" a misprint or something went wrong?
>
> that should have been "without problem".
Thanks for the clarification :)
> All good in my test, but that was more or less booting and checking
> memory log messages.
Well, this is way better than build testing I did. The commit 465aaed0030b
("MIPS: Octeon: Select CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE") that added
CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE for Octeons talked about crashes at boot time, so
boot testing seems appropriate.
The only concern, is peculiar memory configuration Octeon may have with
Linux and non-Linux "partitions" that will be different on different
systems, but nevertheless I think the generic mm nowadays is robust enough
to cope with those without CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE.
I presumed the patch would go via MIPS tree, so it's you call Thomas.
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
