On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:03:01PM +0800, Zhou Yanjie wrote: > Sorry for my carelessness, the log in the previous email was wrong, please > check the log in this email. > > [ 53.684067] --- pte 1 = 07698685 any chance to print the virtual address to this pte ? > [ 53.687376] --- pte 3 = 07698685 > [ 53.737175] --- pte 1 = 07699685 > [ 53.740412] --- pte 3 = 07699685 > [ 53.744064] --- pte 1 = 076c3685 > [..] could you print PTE, which faults ? And what is mapped there ? so far I haven't seen any ill-effects of the (bisected ?) patch. The problem I have with reverting is that IMHO we re-introduce the bug, which this patch fixed. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
