On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 09:45:56AM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > The queued rwlock code has a dependency on the current spinlock > implementation (likely to be qspinlock), but not vice versa. Including > qrwlock.h before qspinlock.h can be problematic when expanding qrwlock > functionality. > > If both qspinlock.h and qrwlock.h are to be included, the qrwlock.h > include should always be after qspinlock.h. Update the current set of > asm/spinlock.h files to enforce that. > > Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h | 2 +- > arch/mips/include/asm/spinlock.h | 2 +- > arch/xtensa/include/asm/spinlock.h | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) which tree should this go through ? I can take it via mips-next, if everybody agrees. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
