On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 09:34:35AM +0800, Yanteng Si wrote: > This commit adds a prototype to fix error at W=1: > > arch/mips/mm/cache.c:211:12: error: no previous prototype > for '__uncached_access' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] > > Signed-off-by: Yanteng Si <siyanteng@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h > index 804889b70965..76d36484a0ad 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h > +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h > @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct; > > extern unsigned long _page_cachable_default; > extern void __update_cache(unsigned long address, pte_t pte); > +extern int __weak __uncached_access(struct file *file, unsigned long addr); I'm in favour of removing __uncached_access(). Is there a real good reason for the special loongson2ef treatment ? Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
