On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:38:19 +0100 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > The other point is that memcpy doesn't have a downside now - it doesn't > > crackle when properly double-buffered. It's simpler this way vs > > workqueues/etc. > > I'm fine with the other workaround as long as it works effectively. > It needs more description in the code, though :) v4 has a comment about that in push(). Can you review v4 and point out where it needs more comments? - Lauri
