Hi Nemoto-san,
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:18 AM Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 21:41:24 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > Is that sufficient to keep it?
> >>
> >> for me it is. But now we probaly need some reverts then...
> >
> > Indeed. Fortunately not all of it, as some removals were TX4938-only.
>
> These patches should not break RBTX4927:
>
> net: tc35815: Drop support for TX49XX boards
> spi: txx9: Remove driver
> mtd: Remove drivers used by TX49xx
> char: hw_random: Remove tx4939 driver
> rtc: tx4939: Remove driver
> ide: tx4938ide: Remove driver
Indeed.
> And these patches just break audio-support only.
>
> dma: tx49 removal
> ASoC: txx9: Remove driver
>
> I think dma and ASoC drivers are hard to maintain now, and can be
> dropped for basic support for RBTX4927.
> (TX39 boards does not have audio-support, so dma txx9 driver can be
> dropped too)
Agreed, I don't test audio anyway, but I know it used to work (I had
intended to use the board as an MPD media server, but never got beyond
the prototyping phase).
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
