Hei Pavel, Am Mittwoch, 7. Oktober 2020, 12:03:59 CEST schrieb Pavel Machek: > > The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain > > naming scheme (now). Parent node name is not enforced, but recommended > > by DT project. > > > > DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml > > CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml > > > > /home/alex/build/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.exampl > > e.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'panel' does not match any of the regexes: > > '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'> > > From schema: > > /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ > > leds-pwm.yaml> > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Okay, so I need Rob's ack here, I guess... and rest of the series is > not really for my tree. I think so, too. I saw you applied patch number 1, all the other patches are DT and from my side those can wait for the Acks required and maybe I change the indexes again and I'm fine resending all that after the 5.10 merge window. Thanks for applying the non-DT patches for leds subsystem, the rest will be sorted out without hurry. Greets Alex
