On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 10:04:27AM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > Remove another unused MIPS platform. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/mips/Kbuild.platforms | 1 - > arch/mips/Kconfig | 30 --- > arch/mips/configs/pnx8335_stb225_defconfig | 77 ------ > arch/mips/include/asm/mach-pnx833x/gpio.h | 159 ------------ > arch/mips/include/asm/mach-pnx833x/irq-mapping.h | 112 --------- > arch/mips/include/asm/mach-pnx833x/irq.h | 40 --- > arch/mips/include/asm/mach-pnx833x/pnx833x.h | 189 -------------- > arch/mips/include/asm/mipsregs.h | 12 - > arch/mips/pnx833x/Makefile | 4 - > arch/mips/pnx833x/Platform | 4 - > arch/mips/pnx833x/common/Makefile | 2 - > arch/mips/pnx833x/common/interrupts.c | 303 ----------------------- > arch/mips/pnx833x/common/platform.c | 224 ----------------- > arch/mips/pnx833x/common/prom.c | 51 ---- > arch/mips/pnx833x/common/reset.c | 31 --- > arch/mips/pnx833x/common/setup.c | 48 ---- > arch/mips/pnx833x/stb22x/Makefile | 2 - > arch/mips/pnx833x/stb22x/board.c | 120 --------- > 18 files changed, 1409 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 arch/mips/configs/pnx8335_stb225_defconfig > delete mode 100644 arch/mips/include/asm/mach-pnx833x/gpio.h > delete mode 100644 arch/mips/include/asm/mach-pnx833x/irq-mapping.h > delete mode 100644 arch/mips/include/asm/mach-pnx833x/irq.h > delete mode 100644 arch/mips/include/asm/mach-pnx833x/pnx833x.h > delete mode 100644 arch/mips/pnx833x/Makefile > delete mode 100644 arch/mips/pnx833x/Platform > delete mode 100644 arch/mips/pnx833x/common/Makefile > delete mode 100644 arch/mips/pnx833x/common/interrupts.c > delete mode 100644 arch/mips/pnx833x/common/platform.c > delete mode 100644 arch/mips/pnx833x/common/prom.c > delete mode 100644 arch/mips/pnx833x/common/reset.c > delete mode 100644 arch/mips/pnx833x/common/setup.c > delete mode 100644 arch/mips/pnx833x/stb22x/Makefile > delete mode 100644 arch/mips/pnx833x/stb22x/board.c applied to mips-next. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
