On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 05:13:39PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > > > 在 2020/8/3 下午2:05, Huacai Chen 写道: > >Hi, Thomas, > > > >On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 7:57 PM Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > >>在 2020/7/31 下午4:32, Thomas Bogendoerfer 写道: > >>>On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 11:01:58AM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote: > >>>>Hi, Thomas, > >>>> > >>>>On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 6:08 PM Huacai Chen <chenhc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>>Hi, Thomas, > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 6:00 PM Thomas Bogendoerfer > >>>>><tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>>>On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 02:58:36PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote: > >>>>>>>Document loongson64v-4core-virtio, a virtio based kvm guest board for > >>>>>>>Loongson-3. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhc@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>>>Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>>>Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>>hmm, I can't remember adding my signed-off to this patch. Could you > >>>>>>give me a reference for this ? > >>>>>> > >>>>>I'm sorry, this is a copy paste error.. > >>>>> > >>>>Should I send V2 for this series? > >>>no, if nothing else needs a resent. Problem with this series is, > >>>that it touches a few places, so it's not clear who should merge > >>>it... > >>Actually the first patch is already in the next. I suspect they should > >>go through MIPS tree. > >>Probably this patch needs a ack from Rob? > >I agree with Jiaxun, this series should go through MIPS tree. > > I'd suggest to have a topic branch for this after getting PCI tree merged. > > Anyway, I really wish to see this as a part of 5.9 release. I've applied patches 2-5 to mips-next. To avoid the mess with the first patch, I've removed the case PCI_VENDOR_ID_REDHAT: from patch 3 as this is the same as the default: case. It would help a lot to not mix patches to different trees in one series next time. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
