Hi James,
On Tue, 2 May 2017 22:26:05 +0100 James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/arch/metag/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/metag/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > index 469a2f1393d3..1e5f26d2dce8 100644
> > --- a/arch/metag/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > +++ b/arch/metag/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > @@ -28,24 +28,32 @@
> >
> > #define segment_eq(a, b) ((a).seg == (b).seg)
> >
> > -#define __kernel_ok (segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS))
>
> FYI this patch, commit 8a8b56638bca ("metag/uaccess: Fix access_ok()"),
> just pushed to metag/for-next, will conflict with Al's commit
> db68ce10c4f0 ("new helper: uaccess_kernel()") from his vfs/for-next
> branch.
>
> This change should supersede Al's metag change, i.e. __kernel_ok should
> be removed from this file.
Thanks for letting me know.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-metag" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
