On Wednesday 23 March 2016 07:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 23-03-16 17:37:18, Vaishali Thakkar wrote: >> Current code fails to ignore the 'hugepages=' parameters when unsupported >> hugepagesize is specified. With this patchset, introduce new architecture >> independent routine hugetlb_bad_size to handle such command line options. >> And then call it in architecture specific code. >> >> Changes since v1: >> - Separated different architecture specific changes in different >> patches >> - CC'ed all arch maintainers > The hugetlb parameters parsing is a bit mess but this at least makes it > behave more consistently. Feel free to add to all patches > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> > > On a side note. I have received patches with broken threading - the > follow up patches are not in the single thread under this cover email. > I thought this was the default behavior of git send-email but maybe your > (older) version doesn't do that. --thread option would enforce that > (with --no-chain-reply-to) or you can set it up in the git config. IMHO > it is always better to have the patchset in the single email thread. > Yes, now I have set up my git config for that. Hopefully, things will work properly - patchset in a single thread from the next time. Thanks. -- Vaishali -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-metag" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
