On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:43:36AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 05:14:14PM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > > On 01/10/2016 06:18 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > >On mips dma_rmb, dma_wmb, smp_store_mb, read_barrier_depends, > > >smp_read_barrier_depends, smp_store_release and smp_load_acquire match > > >the asm-generic variants exactly. Drop the local definitions and pull in > > >asm-generic/barrier.h instead. > > > > > This statement doesn't fit MIPS barriers variations. Moreover, there is a > > reason to extend that even more specific, at least for smp_store_release and > > smp_load_acquire, look into > > > > http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/10506/ > > > > - Leonid. > > Fine, but it matches what current code is doing. Since that > MIPS_LIGHTWEIGHT_SYNC patch didn't go into linux-next yet, do > you see a problem reworking it on top of this patchset? That patch is a complete doorstop atm. It needs a lot more work before it can go anywhere. Don't worry about it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-metag" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
