On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 09:37:37AM +1000, Julian Calaby wrote: > I.e. ~90% of this patch set seems to be just mechanically dropping > BUG_ON()s and converting open coded stuff to use accessor functions > (which should be macros or get inlined, right?) - and the remaining > bit is not flushing if we don't have a physical page somewhere. Which is was 90%. By lines changed most actually is the diffs for the cache flushing. > Would it make sense to split this patch set into a few bits: one to > drop all the useless BUG_ON()s, one to convert all the open coded > stuff to accessor functions, then another to do the actual page-less > sg stuff? Without the ifs the BUG_ON() actually are useful to assert we never feed the sort of physical addresses we can't otherwise support, so I don't think that part is doable. A simple series to make more use of sg_phys and add sg_pfn might still be useful, though. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-metag" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
