On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 01:07:35PM +0100, James Hogan wrote: > Commit d6bb3e9075bb (vfs: simplify and shrink stack frame of > link_path_walk()) introduced build problems with GCC versions older than > 4.6 due to the initialisation of a member of an anonymous union in > struct qstr without enclosing braces. > > This hits GCC bug 10676 [1] (which was fixed in GCC 4.6 by [2]), and > causes the following build error: > fs/namei.c: In function 'link_path_walk': > fs/namei.c:1778: error: unknown field 'hash_len' specified in initializer > > This is worked around by adding explicit braces. IOW, the same thing QSTR_INIT is doing... BTW, after looking at the commit in question, what the hell was this + name = this.name; in link_path_walk() about? Granted, none of the ->d_hash() instances in the tree reassign qstr->name, and out-of-tree ones are unlikely to do it either, so it's harmless but... why bother rereading this.name at all? Linus? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-metag" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
