On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 14:16 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > I don't understand why your patch should break things, I suspect it's > > related to the sparse behaviour you're trying to work around, but can we > > please drop this patch until a more portable workaround can be found? > > Older gcc's often have this problem. > > I suppose that build bustage is more serious than sparse false > positives so yes, let's please try to find an alternative. Since most people probably don't use sparse without compiling (in fact it's pretty difficult to do so) I'll just send a patch to disable __compiletime_assert for sparse - any objections? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-metag" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
