On 11/14/2013 05:25 PM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> On 2013/11/14 16:11, Chen Gang wrote:
>
>> Like another p?d_alloc(), pud_alloc() also may fail, so need check it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/metag/kernel/dma.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/metag/kernel/dma.c b/arch/metag/kernel/dma.c
>> index db589ad..e6cf39b 100644
>> --- a/arch/metag/kernel/dma.c
>> +++ b/arch/metag/kernel/dma.c
>> @@ -398,6 +398,11 @@ static int __init dma_alloc_init(void)
>> int offset = pgd_index(CONSISTENT_START);
>> pgd = pgd_offset(&init_mm, CONSISTENT_START);
>> pud = pud_alloc(&init_mm, pgd, CONSISTENT_START);
>> + if (!pud) {
>> + pr_err("%s: no pud tables\n", __func__);
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + break;
>> + }
>
> It looks fine to me.
>
Thank you too.
James has his opinion about it, we are just discussing, welcome you
join.
:-)
Thanks.
> Thanks,
> Xishi Qiu
>
>> pmd = pmd_alloc(&init_mm, pud, CONSISTENT_START);
>> if (!pmd) {
>> pr_err("%s: no pmd tables\n", __func__);
>
>
>
>
--
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-metag" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
