Hello, Yuki, all, > Why "usbvision: revert commit 588afcc1" is not accepted in linux-media ? As mentioned in a message from Hans down this thread, it "fell through the cracks", unfortunately. (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg99495.html) Best regards, Vladis Dronov | Red Hat, Inc. | Product Security Engineer ----- Original Message ----- From: "Yuki Machida" <machida.yuki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Vladis Dronov" <vdronov@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "sasha levin" <sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx, oneukum@xxxxxxxx, mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 10:32:12 AM Subject: Re: Backport a Security Fix for CVE-2015-7833 to v4.1 Hi Vladis, On 2016年04月15日 18:55, Vladis Dronov wrote: > Hello, Yuki, all, > > My commit fa52bd506f resolves CVE-2015-7833, as mentioned in > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg96936.html I understand that commit fa52bd506f resolved security issue of CVE-2015-7833 and commit 588afcc1 is not needed for fixing of CVE-2015-7833. > Please, note a message from Hans down this thread, who agrees > with my point. I understand the opinion of Vladis and Hans. Why "usbvision: revert commit 588afcc1" is not accepted in linux-media ? Regards, Yuki Machida -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
