Em Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:31:51 +0100 Alec Leamas <leamas.alec@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > On 12/11/15 18:20, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:16:18 +0300 > > Alberto Mardegan <mardy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > Complaining doesn't help at all. We don't read the mailing list to > > check for new patches. Instead, we look for them at: > > https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/list/ > > > > All patches that goes to the ML are automatically stored there, and will be > > handled by one of the (sub-)maintainers. > > > However, if the emailer breaks the patch (with was the case of the > > "tv tuner max2165..." patch), patchwork won't recognize it as a > > patch, and we'll only see the e-mail by accident. > > Ah... that explains why nobody cares about my patch[1]... Is there any > way around picky emailers? Use a good one ;) Here, I use claws-mail, with works fine if configured to send text-only e-mails and to not break long lines. Another alternative is to use git to send the email with something like: git send-email HEAD~1 --annotate That requires some setup at the .git/config file: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-send-email As you use gmail, you could add at the .git/config: [sendemail] smtpEncryption = tls smtpServer = smtp.gmail.com smtpUser = yourname@xxxxxxxxx smtpServerPort = 587 > Is putting the patch in an attachment OK? No, because it doesn't make easy for people to reply with comments. Regards, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
