Re: [PATCH 13/13] DocBook: add SDR specific info to G_MODULATOR / S_MODULATOR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/04/2015 01:26 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 09/01/2015 11:59 PM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
Add SDR specific notes to G_MODULATOR / S_MODULATOR documentation.

Signed-off-by: Antti Palosaari <crope@xxxxxx>
---
  Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-g-modulator.xml | 9 +++++++++
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-g-modulator.xml b/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-g-modulator.xml
index 80167fc..affb694 100644
--- a/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-g-modulator.xml
+++ b/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-g-modulator.xml
@@ -78,6 +78,15 @@ different audio modulation if the request cannot be satisfied. However
  this is a write-only ioctl, it does not return the actual audio
  modulation selected.</para>

+    <para><link linkend="sdr">SDR</link> specific modulator types are
+<constant>V4L2_TUNER_SDR</constant> and <constant>V4L2_TUNER_RF</constant>.
+Valid fields for these modulator types are <structfield>index</structfield>,
+<structfield>name</structfield>, <structfield>capability</structfield>,
+<structfield>rangelow</structfield>, <structfield>rangehigh</structfield>
+and <structfield>type</structfield>. All the rest fields must be

s/rest/remaining/

+initialized to zero by both application and driver.

I would drop this sentence. The spec is clear about which fields have to be set
by the user. The only thing I would mention here is that txsubchans should be
initialized to 0 by applications (we might want to use it in the future) when
calling S_MODULATOR.

For S_TUNER it is the same: only mention that audmode should be initialized to
0 for these SDR tuner types.

+Term modulator means SDR transmitter on this context.</para>

s/Term/The term/
s/on/in/

Note: the same typos are in patch 12/13.

Perhaps this sentence should be rewritten since it is not clear what you
mean. I guess the idea is that 'modulator' is not a good match to what actually
happens in the SDR hardware?

How about:

"Note that the term 'modulator' is a misnomer for type V4L2_TUNER_SDR since
this really is a DAC and the 'modulator' frequency is in reality the sampling
frequency of the DAC."

I hope I got that right.

And do something similar for patch 12/13.

I added it mainly because struct v4l2_modulator is somehow misleading as it contains both modulator and RF frontend specific stuff and especially misleading for SDR case as modulator is located in a host computer software. On DVB side modulator/demodulator and tuner are split more correctly.

If you look that struct v4l2_modulator:
index: common field
name: common field
capability: contains both RF frontend and modulator stuff
rangelow: RF frontend specific
rangehigh: RF frontend specific
txsubchans: modulator specific
type: common field
reserved: reserved

So actually most field on that struct v4l2_modulator are RF frontend specific, not modulator. Same applies to struct v4l2_tuner.

These should be probably:
tuner => receiver
modulator => transmitter

Or even better, like DVB side, split modulator/demodulator and RF stuff to own structs. But as it is not reasonable to start changing those, so I decided to add comment for tuner that it means SDR receiver and for modulator it means SDR transmitter.

regards
Antti


+
      <para>To change the radio frequency the &VIDIOC-S-FREQUENCY; ioctl
  is available.</para>



Regards,

	Hans


--
http://palosaari.fi/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux