Hi Sakari, On 07/02/15 15:01, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Hans, > > Thanks for the patch! > > On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 01:33:48PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: >> From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> While normal video/radio/vbi/swradio nodes have a proper QUERYCAP ioctl >> that apps can call to determine that it is indeed a V4L2 device, there >> is currently no equivalent for v4l-subdev nodes. Adding this ioctl will >> solve that, and it will allow utilities like v4l2-compliance to be used >> with these devices as well. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ >> include/uapi/linux/v4l2-subdev.h | 12 ++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c >> index 6359606..2ab1f7d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c >> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c >> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ >> #include <linux/types.h> >> #include <linux/videodev2.h> >> #include <linux/export.h> >> +#include <linux/version.h> >> >> #include <media/v4l2-ctrls.h> >> #include <media/v4l2-device.h> >> @@ -187,6 +188,24 @@ static long subdev_do_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, void *arg) >> #endif >> >> switch (cmd) { >> + case VIDIOC_SUBDEV_QUERYCAP: { >> + struct v4l2_subdev_capability *cap = arg; >> + >> + cap->version = LINUX_VERSION_CODE; >> + cap->device_caps = 0; >> + cap->pads = 0; >> + cap->entity_id = 0; >> +#if defined(CONFIG_MEDIA_CONTROLLER) >> + if (sd->entity.parent) { >> + cap->device_caps = V4L2_SUBDEV_CAP_ENTITY; >> + cap->pads = sd->entity.num_pads; >> + cap->entity_id = sd->entity.id; >> + } >> +#endif >> + memset(cap->reserved, 0, sizeof(cap->reserved)); >> + break; >> + } >> + >> case VIDIOC_QUERYCTRL: >> return v4l2_queryctrl(vfh->ctrl_handler, arg); >> >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-subdev.h b/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-subdev.h >> index dbce2b5..e48b9fd 100644 >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-subdev.h >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-subdev.h >> @@ -154,9 +154,21 @@ struct v4l2_subdev_selection { >> __u32 reserved[8]; >> }; >> >> +struct v4l2_subdev_capability { >> + __u32 version; >> + __u32 device_caps; > > This is called capabilities in struct v4l2_capability. I'd follow the same > pattern. No, it's called device_caps in struct v4l2_capability. The capabilities field in that same structure contains the capabilities of the device as a whole: so not just of the device node in question, but the union of the capabilities of all device nodes created by the driver. > >> + __u32 pads; >> + __u32 entity_id; > > What's the use case for the entity_id field btw.? Supposing that the user > wouldn't be using the MC interface to obtain it, is the entity_id relevant > in this context? Or is your intent first open the sub-device, and then find > out more information on the entity? Right, the latter. I want to be able to do v4l2-compliance -d /dev/v4l-subdev0 and it should be able to figure everything out from there. > >> + __u32 reserved[48]; > > Why 48? Can't remember :-) > > As memory is typically allocated in powers of two (or n^2 + (n-1)^2), how > about aligning it accordingly? I don't think we lose anything by making this > e.g. 60. Although 28 would probably suffice as well (or 29 with the pads > field removed as discussed). Even that much sounds like a lot. 29 would work fine as well. In general I am more generous with reserved fields these days since we've hit the limits of it too often. Regards, Hans > >> +}; >> + >> +/* This v4l2_subdev is also a media entity and the entity_id field is valid */ >> +#define V4L2_SUBDEV_CAP_ENTITY (1 << 0) >> + >> /* Backwards compatibility define --- to be removed */ >> #define v4l2_subdev_edid v4l2_edid >> >> +#define VIDIOC_SUBDEV_QUERYCAP _IOR('V', 0, struct v4l2_subdev_capability) >> #define VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_FMT _IOWR('V', 4, struct v4l2_subdev_format) >> #define VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_FMT _IOWR('V', 5, struct v4l2_subdev_format) >> #define VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_FRAME_INTERVAL _IOWR('V', 21, struct v4l2_subdev_frame_interval) > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html