2015-06-26 15:14 GMT+03:00 Kamil Debski <kamil@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi Mikhail,
>
> On 26 June 2015 at 12:34, Mikhail Ulyanov
> <mikhail.ulyanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks everybody for comments.
>>
>> 2015-06-22 17:54 GMT+03:00 Kamil Debski <kamil@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am adding Jacek Anaszewski to CC loop. He was working with the
>>> s5p-jpeg driver some time ago.
>>> I've spoken with him about questions in this email recently. Jacek,
>>> thank you for your comments :)
>>>
>>> On 18 June 2015 at 20:48, Laurent Pinchart
>>> <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Hi Mikhail,
>>>>
>>>> (CC'ing Kamil Debski)
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday 06 May 2015 01:03:10 Mikhail Ulianov wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 04 May 2015 02:32:05 +0300 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>
>>>>> >> +/*
>>>>> >> + * ====================================================================
>>>>> >> + * Queue operations
>>>>> >> + * ====================================================================
>>>>> >> + */
>>>>> >> +static int jpu_queue_setup(struct vb2_queue *vq,
>>>>> >> + const struct v4l2_format *fmt,
>>>>> >> + unsigned int *nbuffers, unsigned int
>>>>> >> *nplanes,
>>>>> >> + unsigned int sizes[], void
>>>>> >> *alloc_ctxs[])
>>>>> >> +{
>>>>> >> + struct jpu_ctx *ctx = vb2_get_drv_priv(vq);
>>>>> >> + struct jpu_q_data *q_data;
>>>>> >> + unsigned int count = *nbuffers;
>>>>> >> + unsigned int i;
>>>>> >> +
>>>>> >> + q_data = jpu_get_q_data(ctx, vq->type);
>>>>> >> +
>>>>> >> + *nplanes = q_data->format.num_planes;
>>>>> >> +
>>>>> >> + /*
>>>>> >> + * Header is parsed during decoding and parsed information
>>>>> >> stored
>>>>> >> + * in the context so we do not allow another buffer to
>>>>> >> overwrite it.
>>>>> >> + * For now it works this way, but planned for alternation.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It shouldn't be difficult to create a jpu_buffer structure that
>>>>> > inherits from vb2_buffer and store the information there instead of
>>>>> > in the context.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are absolutely right. But for this version i want to keep it
>>>>> simple and also at this moment not everything clear for me with this
>>>>> format "autodetection" feature we want to have e.g. for decoder if user
>>>>> requested 2 output buffers and then queue first with some valid JPEG
>>>>> with format -1-(so we setup queues format here), after that
>>>>> another one with format -2-... should we discard second one or just
>>>>> change format of queues? what about same situation if user already
>>>>> requested capture buffers. I mean relations with buf_prepare and
>>>>> queue_setup. AFAIU format should remain the same for all requested
>>>>> buffers. I see only one "solid" solution here - get rid of
>>>>> "autodetection" feature and rely only on format setted by user, so in
>>>>> this case we can just discard queued buffers with inappropriate
>>>>> format(kind of format validation in kernel). This solution will also
>>>>> work well with NV61, NV21, and semiplanar formats we want to add in next
>>>>> version. *But* with this solution header parsing must be done twice(in
>>>>> user and kernel spaces).
>>>>> I'm a little bit frustrated here :)
>>>>
>>>> Yes, it's a bit frustrating indeed. I'm not sure what to advise, I'm not too
>>>> familiar with the m2m API for JPEG.
>>>>
>>>> Kamil, do you have a comment on that ?
>>>
>>> I am not sure whether it is good to get rid of header parsing by the
>>> driver/hardware option. I agree that the buffers should have a
>>> consistent format and size. Maybe the way to go would be to allow
>>> header parsing by the hardware, but to stop processing when the format
>>> has changed? Other solution would be to use the
>>> V4L2_EVENT_SOURCE_CHANGE event to inform user space about the change.
>>> User space then could check whether the buffers are sufficient or
>>> reallocate them. Similar to what happens in MFC when format changes.
>>>
>>> For me implementing resolution change in JPEG seems like an overkill,
>>> but maybe you have a use case that would benefit from this. Initially
>>> the JPEG decoder was designed and written as a one shot device. Could
>>> you give an example of such use case?
>>>
>>> The possible use case I can imagine is having an M-JPEG stream where
>>> all JPEGs have the same dimensions and format. There I can see some
>>> benefits from having more than one buffer on the queues. Then there
>>> would be no change in the buffer parameters, so this should work.
>>
>> That's correct. It's exactly our use case, but we have few cameras. So
>> we serialize buffers in user space and sometimes one(or more) cameras
>> have different configuration. I think i should go with stop processing
>> option.
>
> It could be possible to have frames from each camera decoded in
> different contexts. This way the configuration should be consistent
> for all frames in a context. It will require more memory (more
> buffers) though...
Yes, that's an option. Anyway in latest (v4) version i decided to drop
frames with different format and make driver more strict in general. I
think it's more robust in any case. Nobody knows what user will pass
to kernel :)
>>>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>
> Best wishes,
> Kamil Debski
--
W.B.R, Mikhail.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
