From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx> Mauro, Doug, The 0-day robot found using WARN() on built-in kernels confusing. Upon further thought pr_warn() is better and will likely also not confuse humans too. Boris, provided maintainers Ack, please consider these patches. These depend on pat_enabled() exported symbol which went in through the x86 tree, so I suppose this also needs to go through there. This is an example issue of cross-tree collateral evolution follow ups, one reason why I punted the a RFD and proposal for a linux-oven [0]. In that regard I suppose follow ups like these would need to go through that tree as well. [0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150619231255.GC7487@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Luis R. Rodriguez (2): x86/mm/pat, drivers/infiniband/ipath: replace WARN() with pr_warn() x86/mm/pat, drivers/media/ivtv: replace WARN() with pr_warn() drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_driver.c | 6 ++++-- drivers/media/pci/ivtv/ivtvfb.c | 6 ++++-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) -- 2.3.2.209.gd67f9d5.dirty -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
