Hi Sakari, On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:52:12 +0300 Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Jacek, > > Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > ... > >>> +#define call_flash_op(v4l2_flash, op, > >>> arg) \ > >>> + (has_flash_op(v4l2_flash, > >>> op) ? \ > >>> + v4l2_flash->ops->op(v4l2_flash, > >>> arg) : \ > >>> + -EINVAL) > >>> + > >>> +static enum led_brightness __intensity_to_led_brightness( > >>> + struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl, > >>> + s32 intensity) > >> > >> Fits on previous line. > >> > >>> +{ > >>> + s64 intensity64 = intensity - ctrl->minimum; > >> > >> intensity, ctrl->step and ctrl->minimum are 32-bit signed integers. > >> Do you need a 64-bit integer here? > > > > step is u64. > > Nevertheless integer controls will not have values outside the s32 > range, using a step value that's outside the range makes no sense > either. I think you should use s32 instead. I infer that local u32 variable should be assigned ctrl->step, and then used as a divisor. > > > >> > >>> + > >>> + do_div(intensity64, ctrl->step); > >>> + > >>> + /* > >>> + * Indicator LEDs, unlike torch LEDs, are turned on/off > >>> basing on > >>> + * the state of V4L2_CID_FLASH_INDICATOR_INTENSITY > >>> control only. > >>> + * Therefore it must be possible to set it to 0 level > >>> which in > >>> + * the LED subsystem reflects LED_OFF state. > >>> + */ > >>> + if (ctrl->id != V4L2_CID_FLASH_INDICATOR_INTENSITY) > >>> + ++intensity64; > >> > >> I think the condition could simply be ctrl->minimum instead, that > >> way I find it easier to understand what's happening here. I'd > >> expect the minimum for non-intensity controls always to be > >> non-zero, though, so the end result is the same. Up to you. > > > > Minimum for indicator control must be 0 to make possible > > turning the indicator LED off only with this control. > > Would torch be still on if the minimum torch current was 0 mA? I'd > say no. > > Although in that case I'd expect the driver to use a different range, > and selecting the off mode would then turn it off, I still think > that's a better condition than relying on the control id. I didn't catch your point previously. Probably you was thinking about somethig like this: if (ctrl->minimum) ++intensity; If so, I agree. > ... > > >>> +static int v4l2_flash_g_volatile_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *c) > >>> +{ > >>> + struct v4l2_flash *v4l2_flash = > >>> v4l2_ctrl_to_v4l2_flash(c); > >>> + struct led_classdev_flash *fled_cdev = > >>> v4l2_flash->fled_cdev; > >>> + bool is_strobing; > >>> + int ret; > >>> + > >>> + switch (c->id) { > >>> + case V4L2_CID_FLASH_TORCH_INTENSITY: > >>> + case V4L2_CID_FLASH_INDICATOR_INTENSITY: > >>> + return > >>> v4l2_flash_update_led_brightness(v4l2_flash, c); > >>> + case V4L2_CID_FLASH_INTENSITY: > >>> + ret = led_update_flash_brightness(fled_cdev); > >>> + if (ret < 0) > >>> + return ret; > >>> + /* no conversion is needed */ > >> > >> Maybe a stupid question, but why is it not needed? > > > > Because LED Flash class also uses microamperes. > > Right, I had missed that. It'd be nice if that was said in the > comment, it might not be obvious to others either. OK, I will add the comment. -- Best Regards, Jacek Anaszewski -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html