On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 03:20:05PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > Hi Andrew, Russell, > > On 04/04/2015 02:17, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 06:13:13PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > >> clkdev_create() is a shorter way to write clkdev_alloc() followed by > >> clkdev_add(). Use this instead. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Acked-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx> > > This change makes sens however what about Thomas' comment: removing > orion_clkdev_add() entirely and directly using lkdev_create() all over > the place: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/327294.html > > Then what would be the path for this patch? > > As there is a dependency on the 6th patch of this series: "clkdev: add > clkdev_create() helper" which should be merged through the clk tree, I > think the best option is that this patch would be also managed by the > clk tree maintainer (I added them in CC). Let me remind people that clkdev is *NOT* part of clk, and that I'm the maintainer for clkdev. I'm getting rather pissed off with people taking work away from me, even when I'm named in the MAINTAINERS file. These patches are going through my tree unless there's a good reason for them not to. They are _not_ going through the clk tree. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
