Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 04/04/15 05:43, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> clk_add_alias() is provided by clkdev, and is not part of the clk API. >>> Howver, it is prototyped in two locations: linux/clkdev.h and >>> linux/clk.h. This is a mess. Get rid of the redundant and unnecessary >>> version in linux/clk.h. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Tested-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx> >> >> Actually, this serie fixes a regression I've seen in linux-next, and which was >> triggering the Oops in [1] on lubbock. With your serie, the kernel boots fine. >> >> > > Is this with the lubbock_defconfig? Is it a regression in 4.0-rc series > or is it due to some pending -next patches interacting with the per-user > clock patches? It looks like the latter because __clk_get_hw() should be > inlined on lubbock_defconfig where CONFIG_COMMON_CLK=n. It's upon linux-next and the "not yet pulled" pxa tree merged : - http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/331119.html I think it will appear once arm-soc has been prepared for linux-next and pulled. This specific merge window will shift pxa architecture to common clock framework, that's why I saw the regression. Cheers. -- Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
