On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Mon 2015-03-23 15:02:13, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > On Mon 2015-03-23 12:07:43, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > This patch requires a DT Ack. > > > > > > No, it requires DT people to be notified -- and they were, few times > > > by now. > > > > > > They clearly don't care. > > > > Well fortunately for the Kernel community, I do care. And as this > > patch adds 3 new DT properties, has been through many iterations > > already with vast changes made over that period and there is still > > some controversy looming, I'm saying that it _does_ require a DT > > Ack. > > Can you help get that ack, then? As a maintainer, you have better > chance getting reply from DT people than patch submitter. Hopefully they will see my plea a couple of replies back. If that fails I'll go poke them via other means. Failing that I'll go see them in person and continually hit them with wet fish until one of them relents. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
