On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 04:24:47PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: >> Hi Grant, Rob, >> >> Am Dienstag, den 03.03.2015, 08:59 +0100 schrieb Philipp Zabel: >> > Hi Grant, Rob, >> > >> > this series has been around for quite some time now, basically unchanged >> > except for adding fixes for new users of the API that keep appearing >> > over time in different subsystems. >> > >> > It would be really helpful to get this merged for v4.0. Could you still >> > make this happen? >> > >> > Alternatively, could I please get your ack to allow this tag to be >> > merged into the other subsystem trees for v4.1 so that patches that >> > depend on it don't have to wait for yet another merge window? >> >> The question still stands. It would be great to hear from you and maybe >> get this change in at least in time for v4.1. > > Let's look at the history. > > 10-03-2015: This reminder > 03-03-2015: Pull request (ignored from what can be seen) > 01-03-2015: Request from Laurent about what's happening > 27-02-2015: Reminder > 23-02-2015: Re-base (and version 8) due to conflicts > 11-02-2015: Reminder > 22-01-2015: Pull request > 23-12-2014: Version 7 > > During that time, there's not been one peep from Rob or Grant on this. I've only been copied on this latest pull request and a version from March of last year which Grant nak'ed. This series did not go to devicetree list either. I'll take a look at the series. If there is an explanation of how Grant's nak was addressed that would speed up my review. I'm not applying for v4.0 though. Rob > At what point has there been enough pestering that it's sufficient to > bypass an apparently uninterested maintainer, who can't be bothered to > say yes or no to a set of patches? > > For such a key subsystem in the kernel, this is bad. If Grant isn't > interested in performing a maintainer role, I'd be willing to pick up > that function (which'll be ironic, because that's the kind of thing > that Linaro's been doing to me over the last few years... picking > stuff off my plate without any discussion or agreement with me first, > leaving me with almost nothing to do. No, I'm not pissed at that... > not much.) > > I guess if you were to submit patches to Andrew, Andrew may take them > in this circumstance and eventually send them on to Linus. Andrew? > > -- > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up > according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html