Hi Laurent,
On 03/04/15 16:02, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Wednesday 04 March 2015 10:47:54 Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> If a subdevice pad op is called from a bridge driver, then there is
>> no v4l2_subdev_fh struct that can be passed to the subdevice. This
>> made it hard to use such subdevs from a bridge driver.
>>
>> This patch replaces the v4l2_subdev_fh pointer by a v4l2_subdev_pad_config
>> pointer in the pad ops. This allows bridge drivers to use the various
>> try_ pad ops by creating a v4l2_subdev_pad_config struct and passing it
>> along to the pad op.
>>
>> The v4l2_subdev_get_try_* macros had to be changed because of this, so
>> I also took the opportunity to use the full name of the
>> v4l2_subdev_get_try_* functions in the __V4L2_SUBDEV_MK_GET_TRY macro
>> arguments: if you now do 'git grep v4l2_subdev_get_try_format' you will
>> actually find the header where it is defined.
>>
>> One remark regarding the drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe patches: the
>> *_init_formats() functions assumed that fh could be NULL. However, that's
>> not true for this driver, it's always set. This is almost certainly a copy
>> and paste from the omap3isp driver. I've updated the code to reflect the
>> fact that fh is never NULL.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Tested-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> [snip]
>
>> diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h b/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h
>> index 5beeb87..0c43546 100644
>> --- a/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h
>> +++ b/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h
>> @@ -482,6 +482,18 @@ struct v4l2_subdev_ir_ops {
>> struct v4l2_subdev_ir_parameters *params);
>> };
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Used for storing subdev pad information. This structure only needs
>> + * to be passed to the pad op if the 'which' field of the main argument
>> + * is set to V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_TRY. For V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE just
>> + * pass NULL.
>
> Nitpicking, I would say "For V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE is it safe to pass
> NULL.", otherwise it could be understood that callers have to pass NULL for
> ACTIVE.
True. I'll fix that.
Hans
>
>> + */
>> +struct v4l2_subdev_pad_config {
>> + struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt try_fmt;
>> + struct v4l2_rect try_crop;
>> + struct v4l2_rect try_compose;
>> +};
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
